DCIBX vs. DFUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX).
DCIBX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 28, 2011. DFUSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 23, 1999.
Performance
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.10% | 3.70% | 1.19% | 3.73% | -3.75% | -0.53% | 2.78% | 4.09% | 1.36% | 2.30% |
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | -7.05% | 17.76% | 24.91% | 26.28% | -18.14% | 28.53% | 18.41% | 32.08% | -4.45% | 21.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCIBX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DFUSX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DCIBX has underperformed DFUSX with an annualized return of 1.32%, while DFUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.
DCIBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
DFUSX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCIBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DCIBX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank
DCIBX
DFUSX
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCIBX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.85 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.32 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 4.25 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCIBX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.85 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.68 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.76 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.42 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between DCIBX and DFUSX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison
DCIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than DFUSX's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.75% | 2.44% | 2.06% | 1.69% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.61% |
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | 1.14% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 6.24% | 6.57% | 3.82% | 2.74% | 2.64% | 1.56% | 1.95% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCIBX drawdown since its inception was -7.97%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCIBX and DFUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCIBX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -54.96% | +46.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -12.10% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.22% | -24.58% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.97% | -33.79% | +25.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -8.88% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -10.66% | +9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 2.62% | -1.94% |
Volatility
DCIBX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) is 0.73%, while DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that DCIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DCIBX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 4.25% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 8.64% | -7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 17.96% | -15.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 16.83% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.35% | 18.03% | -15.68% |