PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCIBX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCIBX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCIBX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DCIBX has underperformed NPV with an annualized return of 1.35%, while NPV has yielded a comparatively higher 2.39% annualized return.


DCIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
1.35%

NPV

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.05%
YTD
7.07%
6M
5.69%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCIBX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCIBX
DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.83%3.70%1.19%3.73%-3.75%-0.53%2.78%4.09%1.36%2.30%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.07%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DCIBX and NPV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCIBX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCIBX
DCIBX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DCIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DCIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCIBX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCIBXNPVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.01

1.56

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.70

2.32

+2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.29

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.54

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

6.42

+2.03

DCIBX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCIBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCIBX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCIBXNPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

1.56

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.11

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.18

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.29

+0.46

Drawdowns

DCIBX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCIBX drawdown since its inception was -7.97%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCIBX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCIBXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-44.25%

+36.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.80%

-4.31%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-18.29%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.22%

-44.25%

+37.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.97%

-44.25%

+36.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-15.57%

+14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-10.18%

+8.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

1.71%

-1.14%

Volatility

DCIBX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) is 0.51%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that DCIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCIBXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

2.07%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

5.10%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63%

6.93%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

13.48%

-11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.36%

13.19%

-10.83%

DCIBX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCIBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCIBX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

DCIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than NPV's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCIBX
DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.59%2.44%2.06%1.69%1.15%1.05%1.34%1.46%1.44%1.32%1.44%1.61%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.95%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCIBX and NPV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to DCIBX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCIBX dropped -7.97% vs NPV's -44.25%.

DCIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCIBX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer