DCIBX vs. FSMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX).
DCIBX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 28, 2011. FSMUX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 24, 2021.
Performance
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.10% | 3.70% | 1.19% | 3.73% | -3.75% | -0.27% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | -1.13% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCIBX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's -1.13% return.
DCIBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCIBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DCIBX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
DCIBX
FSMUX
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCIBX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.63 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.87 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.19 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.28 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 0.78 | +4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCIBX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.63 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.00 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between DCIBX and FSMUX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
DCIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than FSMUX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.75% | 2.44% | 2.06% | 1.69% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.61% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.35% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCIBX drawdown since its inception was -7.97%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCIBX and FSMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCIBX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -16.27% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -5.30% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -2.56% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -5.61% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 1.96% | -1.28% |
Volatility
DCIBX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) is 0.73%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that DCIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DCIBX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.99% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 2.12% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 6.65% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 4.67% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.35% | 4.67% | -2.32% |