DCFFX vs. DMSFX
DCFFX (Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund) and DMSFX (Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund) are both mutual funds - DCFFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Destinations Funds, while DMSFX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Destinations Funds. Over the past 5 years, DCFFX returned -0.56%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for DMSFX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DCFFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for DMSFX.
Performance
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCFFX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than DMSFX's 0.43% return.
DCFFX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
DMSFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCFFX Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund | 0.63% | 5.65% | 2.28% | 5.11% | -14.66% | -1.43% | 4.71% | 6.94% | 0.03% | 2.07% |
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 0.43% | 3.65% | 6.40% | 12.82% | -3.45% | 5.22% | 10.01% | 8.93% | -4.99% | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCFFX and DMSFX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, DCFFX and DMSFX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCFFX vs. DMSFX — Risk / Return Rank
DCFFX
DMSFX
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund (DCFFX) and Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCFFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.67 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 4.93 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCFFX drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum DMSFX drawdown of -21.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCFFX and DMSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCFFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -21.11% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.47% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.57% | -5.02% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -6.84% | -12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -0.44% | -3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -1.59% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.82% | +0.17% |
Volatility
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Volatility Comparison
Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund (DCFFX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) at 0.55%. This indicates that DCFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCFFX | DMSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.55% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 1.61% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 2.77% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 3.68% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 5.02% | -0.27% |
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCFFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DMSFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCFFX vs. DMSFX - Dividend Comparison
DCFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than DMSFX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCFFX Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.91% | 2.99% | 3.96% | 2.78% | 1.73% | 3.78% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.66% | 1.76% |
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 3.74% | 3.42% | 6.41% | 6.62% | 3.05% | 4.68% | 1.48% | 4.64% | 4.31% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCFFX and DMSFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCFFX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to DMSFX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCFFX dropped -19.20% vs DMSFX's -21.11%.
DMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCFFX and DMSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer