DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L
DBX7.DE (Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBX7.DE tracks the Nifty 50 while XCX5.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX7.DE returned 6.12%/yr vs 6.43%/yr for XCX5.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX7.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBX7.DE is traded in EUR, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX7.DE achieves a -14.67% return, which is significantly lower than XCX5.L's -11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX7.DE has underperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 6.12%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 6.43% annualized return.
DBX7.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -16.12%
- 1Y
- -17.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- -14.37%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -14.67% | -7.11% | 11.08% | 14.41% | 0.26% | 31.14% | 0.48% | 12.15% | -2.45% | 19.29% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -11.91% | -10.11% | 17.32% | 14.95% | -2.95% | 34.40% | 3.54% | 9.10% | -4.74% | 19.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX7.DE and XCX5.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DBX7.DE and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBX7.DE
XCX5.L
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX7.DE | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.70 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | -1.49 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX7.DE | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.90 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.25 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.32 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX7.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -42.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX7.DE and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX7.DE | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -42.13% | -22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -20.53% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.75% | -29.34% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.75% | -29.34% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -40.92% | -0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -25.73% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -11.87% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 9.60% | -0.18% |
Volatility
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) is 5.80%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that DBX7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX7.DE | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 6.19% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 13.16% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 15.93% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 16.24% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 20.13% | +0.22% |
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX7.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX7.DE vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX7.DE nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DBX7.DE and XCX5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XCX5.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCX5.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBX7.DE.
DBX7.DE tracks Nifty 50, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBX7.DE and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for DBX7.DE and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer