PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBX7.DE vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBX7.DE is traded in EUR, while MOAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX7.DE achieves a -14.67% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX7.DE has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 6.12%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.


DBX7.DE

1D
1.02%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-14.67%
6M
-15.66%
1Y
-16.62%
3Y*
-0.53%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
6.12%

MOAT

1D
0.74%
1M
4.26%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.22%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
13.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBX7.DE
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-14.67%-7.11%11.08%14.41%0.26%31.14%0.48%12.15%-2.45%19.29%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.07%-0.23%18.04%27.93%-8.31%33.40%5.37%37.84%3.35%8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DBX7.DE and MOAT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.37

The correlation between DBX7.DE and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX7.DE
DBX7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DBX7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBX7.DEMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.17

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.17

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.76

3.14

-4.90

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX7.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX7.DE and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBX7.DEMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

0.99

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.52

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.69

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.80

-0.62

Drawdowns

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX7.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -32.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX7.DE and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBX7.DEMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-32.83%

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.90%

-11.65%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.75%

-25.00%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.75%

-25.00%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.75%

-32.83%

-8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.53%

-3.92%

-21.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-4.30%

-11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.42%

4.33%

+5.09%

Volatility

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.55%. This indicates that DBX7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBX7.DEMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

3.55%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

9.73%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

13.76%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

17.62%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.35%

18.99%

+1.36%

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBX7.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBX7.DE vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

DBX7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBX7.DE
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBX7.DE and MOAT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBX7.DE.

DBX7.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBX7.DE tracks Nifty 50, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBX7.DE and 0.47% for MOAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBX7.DE and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer