DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE
DBX7.DE (Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - DBX7.DE tracks the Nifty 50 while IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX7.DE returned 6.12%/yr vs 21.81%/yr for IQQT.DE. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX7.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQT.DE.
Performance
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX7.DE achieves a -14.67% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX7.DE has underperformed IQQT.DE with an annualized return of 6.12%, while IQQT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.81% annualized return.
DBX7.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- -16.62%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -14.67% | -7.11% | 11.08% | 14.41% | 0.26% | 31.14% | 0.48% | 12.15% | -2.45% | 19.29% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX7.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between DBX7.DE and IQQT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX7.DE
IQQT.DE
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX7.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.72 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 12.46 | -13.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | 35.53 | -37.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX7.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 4.62 | -5.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 1.03 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 1.04 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX7.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than IQQT.DE's maximum drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX7.DE and IQQT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX7.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -57.60% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -8.93% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.75% | -31.65% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.75% | -32.51% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -32.51% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -1.61% | -23.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -12.71% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 3.14% | +6.28% |
Volatility
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) is 5.80%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that DBX7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX7.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 10.13% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 19.53% | -7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 24.10% | -9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 21.89% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 20.80% | -0.45% |
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX7.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX7.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBX7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX7.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQQT.DE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBX7.DE.
DBX7.DE tracks Nifty 50, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBX7.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX7.DE and IQQT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer