DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DBRC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - DBRC.L tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while EIMI.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBRC.L returned 2.36%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for EIMI.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBRC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.

Performance

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBRC.L achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 18.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DBRC.L has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 2.36%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.25% annualized return.

DBRC.L

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: -13.46%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 1Y: -4.17%
• 3Y*: 7.65%
• 5Y*: -6.80%
• 10Y*: 2.36%

EIMI.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -6.07%
• 6M: 13.34%
• YTD: 18.64%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 9.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	-9.29%	29.65%	13.80%	-7.59%	-28.96%	-23.93%	20.04%	21.82%	-8.40%	36.18%
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	18.64%	32.16%	7.36%	11.03%	-19.67%	-0.65%	18.80%	16.37%	-14.18%	36.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DBRC.L and EIMI.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between DBRC.L and EIMI.L has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBRC.L

DBRC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
DBRC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
DBRC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
DBRC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
DBRC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DBRC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

EIMI.L

EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBRC.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	1.61	-1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	2.20	-2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.30	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	2.72	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	8.68	-9.02

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBRC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBRC.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBRC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBRC.L and EIMI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBRC.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.16%	-38.73%	-31.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.03%	-12.66%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.03%	-17.44%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.70%	-33.69%	-24.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.02%	-38.73%	-27.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.51%	-7.71%	-35.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-13.92%	-17.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.38%	3.98%	+7.40%

Volatility

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) is 6.02%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that DBRC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBRC.L	EIMI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	8.59%	-2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.14%	19.48%	-4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	21.43%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.52%	18.83%	+11.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.51%	19.22%	+7.29%

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBRC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBRC.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

DBRC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.60%	1.74%	2.81%	2.60%	3.58%	1.58%	1.43%	2.02%	2.96%	1.94%	1.89%	2.68%
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBRC.L and EIMI.L in my portfolio?

DBRC.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBRC.L or EIMI.L?

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBRC.L or EIMI.L?

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DBRC.L.

What is the main difference between DBRC.L and EIMI.L?

DBRC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DBRC.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.