DBND vs. IMTB
DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - DBND tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index while IMTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBND returned 4.50%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for IMTB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.
Performance
DBND vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than IMTB's -0.02% return.
DBND
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DBND vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.21% | 7.41% | 3.06% | 6.33% | -5.93% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.02% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 6.10% | -6.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBND and IMTB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DBND and IMTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBND vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank
DBND
IMTB
DBND vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.10 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 6.51 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DBND vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, smaller than the maximum IMTB drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and IMTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -18.15% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.86% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.25% | -6.80% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.74% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -4.13% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DBND vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) is 1.07%, while iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that DBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBND | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.45% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 3.02% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 4.05% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 6.28% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 5.18% | -0.09% |
DBND vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBND vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than IMTB's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DBND and IMTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IMTB has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs IMTB's -18.15%.
On 3-year performance, IMTB leads with 4.75% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IMTB has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.52% for IMTB.
DBND tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBND and IMTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer