PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTB vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTB vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -0.40% return.


IMTB

1D
0.08%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*

IEF

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
2.56%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
0.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTB vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
0.28%8.88%1.94%6.10%-12.75%-1.41%6.25%8.62%-0.45%4.88%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.40%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%0.99%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTB and IEF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2016

0.80

The correlation between IMTB and IEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTB vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTB
IMTB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTB vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTBIEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

0.89

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

1.34

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.95

+1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.69

2.86

+3.83

IMTB vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTB and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTBIEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

0.89

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.13

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Drawdowns

IMTB vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum IEF drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTBIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-23.93%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-4.07%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-7.74%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

-21.40%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-11.12%

+9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.34%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.36%

-0.45%

Volatility

IMTB vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) is 1.43%, while iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that IMTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTBIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.57%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

3.37%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

4.79%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

7.71%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.18%

6.62%

-1.44%

IMTB vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMTB vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison

IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than IEF's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.89%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%
IMTB
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
4.51%4.40%4.42%4.13%2.90%2.49%2.63%2.91%3.04%2.75%0.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IMTB and IEF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IEF has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to IMTB (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTB dropped -18.15% vs IEF's -23.93%.

On 5-year performance, IMTB leads with 0.61% vs -0.98% for IEF. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IMTB has performed better with a 0.61% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IEF.

IMTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.89% for IEF.

IMTB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while IEF is Government Bonds. IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index, while IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMTB and 0.15% for IEF.

IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTB and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer