DBND vs. EUSB
DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - DBND tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index while EUSB tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBND returned 4.50%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
DBND vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than EUSB's 0.13% return.
DBND
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
DBND vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.21% | 7.41% | 3.06% | 6.33% | -5.93% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.13% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 5.80% | -6.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBND and EUSB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DBND and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBND vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
DBND
EUSB
DBND vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.09 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 6.26 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.04 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
DBND vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -17.87% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.48% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.25% | -5.76% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.36% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -6.50% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.82% | +0.13% |
Volatility
DBND vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) is 1.07%, while iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that DBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.17% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.49% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 3.57% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 5.77% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 5.41% | -0.32% |
DBND vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBND vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DBND and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EUSB has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 3-year performance, DBND leads with 4.50% vs 4.27% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBND has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.
DBND tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while EUSB tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.12% for EUSB.
DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBND and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer