PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBND vs. DMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBND vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than DMBS's 0.51% return.


DBND

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*

DMBS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBND vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.21%7.41%3.06%2.28%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.51%8.54%2.09%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DBND and DMBS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.93

The correlation between DBND and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBND vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBND vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBNDDMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.15

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

7.62

-2.52

DBND vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBND and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBNDDMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Drawdowns

DBND vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, which is greater than DMBS's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and DMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBNDDMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-8.14%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-3.20%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-7.24%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.59%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-1.70%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.90%

+0.05%

Volatility

DBND vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) is 1.07%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that DBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBNDDMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.61%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

3.02%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

4.18%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

6.28%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

6.28%

-1.19%

DBND vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBND vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than DMBS's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.79%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.12%4.96%4.97%2.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DBND and DMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.62% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, DMBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.62% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.79% for DBND.

DBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DMBS is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBND and DMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer