DBND vs. DCMT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT).

DBND and DCMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBND is a passively managed fund by DoubleLine that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022. DCMT is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024.

Performance

DBND vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DBND vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.46%	7.41%	2.38%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	26.11%	6.04%	4.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.11% return.

DBND

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 11.21%
• YTD: 26.11%
• 6M: 25.94%
• 1Y: 26.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBND vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

DCMT

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF

DBND

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF

Return for Risk

DBND vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 51
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 47
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 45

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 73
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBND vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBND	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.53	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.10	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.41	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	7.52	-2.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBND vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBND and DCMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBND	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.53	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.15	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between DBND and DCMT is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

DBND vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.80%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.91%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DBND vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBND	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-11.95%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-11.05%	+8.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-2.81%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-3.20%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	3.55%	-2.66%

Volatility

DBND vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) is 1.46%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that DBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBND	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	8.97%	-7.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	13.31%	-11.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71%	17.59%	-13.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.15%	14.85%	-9.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	14.85%	-9.70%