DBMF vs. XILSX

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and XILSX (Pioneer ILS Interval Fund) are both funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while XILSX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Amundi. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 8.70%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for XILSX. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XILSX.

Performance

DBMF vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than XILSX's 9.73% return.

DBMF

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.44%
• 6M: 7.95%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 1Y: 27.97%
• 3Y*: 10.07%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.43%

XILSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 8.61%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 19.34%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	$48.88M	$50.74M	$48.74M
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DBMF vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.95%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.51%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	9.73%	18.70%	18.93%	18.65%	1.23%	-1.10%	7.37%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and XILSX is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	-0.00

Return for Risk

DBMF vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 91
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

XILSX

XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBMF	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	8.04	-5.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	80.44	-77.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	42.80	-41.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	116.68	-112.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.59	796.54	-780.95

DBMF vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and XILSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMF	XILSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-14.53%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-0.21%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-2.36%	-13.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-6.27%	-14.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-4.84%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	0.03%	+1.76%

Volatility

DBMF vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.52%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMF	XILSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	0.52%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	1.56%	+8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	3.06%	+9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.43%	3.77%	+8.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	3.90%	+8.47%

DBMF vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMF vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than XILSX's 8.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.03%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	8.67%	9.51%	13.06%	12.82%	2.68%	2.04%	5.20%	6.63%	6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMF and XILSX in my portfolio?

DBMF and XILSX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBMF or XILSX?

DBMF has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to XILSX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.04 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.