DBMF vs. UUP

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. DBMF is actively managed, while UUP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 7.93%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for UUP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.

Performance

DBMF vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 3.66% return.

DBMF

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 11.78%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: —

UUP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 5.60%
• 3Y*: 4.04%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 3.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	9.70%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.66%	-4.99%	13.50%	3.63%	9.46%	5.73%	-6.66%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and UUP is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.09

The correlation between DBMF and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBMF vs. UUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBMF	UUP
Technology	29.8%	-
Healthcare	12.7%	-
Financial Services	12.5%	97.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	-
Communication Services	8.6%	-
Industrials	8.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

DBMF vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 30
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBMF	UUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.01	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	1.46	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.18	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	1.69	+2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.82	4.49	+12.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBMF vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBMF	UUP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	1.01	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.84	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.20	+0.54

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and UUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMF	UUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-22.19%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-3.65%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-10.05%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-10.37%	-10.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-2.93%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-8.91%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	1.37%	+0.29%

Volatility

DBMF vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.23%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMF	UUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	1.23%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	4.26%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	6.10%	+6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.55%	7.22%	+5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.43%	6.96%	+5.47%

DBMF vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMF vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than UUP's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.22%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.31%	3.43%	4.48%	6.44%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.03%	1.08%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMF and UUP in my portfolio?

DBMF and UUP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBMF or UUP?

DBMF has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to UUP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs UUP's -22.19%.

Which ETF is better, DBMF or UUP?

On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs 6.04% for UUP. On fees, UUP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBMF or UUP?

Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBMF or UUP?

UUP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBMF or UUP?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 3.31% for UUP.

What is the main difference between DBMF and UUP?

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.75% for UUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.