DBMF vs. GOVZ
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and GOVZ (iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while GOVZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. DBMF is actively managed, while GOVZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 7.93%/yr vs -11.53%/yr for GOVZ. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GOVZ.
Performance
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than GOVZ's -0.91% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- —
GOVZ
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- -7.61%
- 5Y*
- -11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.70% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 5.87% |
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | -0.91% | -1.81% | -16.24% | 0.90% | -41.03% | -4.86% | -5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and GOVZ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | -0.30 |
The correlation between DBMF and GOVZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (5 years) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
GOVZ
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMF | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.02 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 0.06 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 0.13 | +16.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMF | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.05 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | -0.48 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.58 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and GOVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -59.65% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -14.16% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -28.72% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -57.63% | +37.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -56.46% | +54.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -39.93% | +33.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 6.27% | -4.61% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.88%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.05% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 10.50% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 16.05% | -3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 23.90% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 23.34% | -10.91% |
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, which matches GOVZ's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.22% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | 5.18% | 5.00% | 4.68% | 3.84% | 3.69% | 1.76% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and GOVZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOVZ has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DBMF (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs GOVZ's -59.65%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs -11.53% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs -11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 5.18% for GOVZ.
DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while GOVZ is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.15% for GOVZ.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and GOVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer