PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOVZ vs. FXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOVZ vs. FXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOVZ achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than FXA's 6.40% return.


GOVZ

1D
0.97%
1M
5.93%
YTD
0.80%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
-7.39%
5Y*
-11.86%
10Y*

FXA

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.01%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
2.27%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOVZ vs. FXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
0.80%-1.81%-16.24%0.90%-41.03%-4.86%-5.61%
FXA
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust
6.40%9.10%-7.75%1.20%-6.46%-6.17%8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GOVZ and FXA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOVZ vs. FXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FXA
FXA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOVZ vs. FXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) and Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOVZFXADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.25

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

6.17

-5.39

GOVZ vs. FXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOVZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the FXA Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOVZ and FXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOVZ vs. FXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOVZ drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, which is greater than FXA's maximum drawdown of -40.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOVZ and FXA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOVZFXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.65%

-40.97%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-4.21%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-13.02%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-19.32%

-38.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.70%

-25.05%

-30.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

-18.82%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.44%

1.54%

+4.90%

Volatility

GOVZ vs. FXA - Volatility Comparison

iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) at 2.32%. This indicates that GOVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOVZFXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.32%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

6.33%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

8.03%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

10.41%

+13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

9.90%

+13.40%

GOVZ vs. FXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOVZ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FXA's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOVZ vs. FXA - Dividend Comparison

GOVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FXA's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXA
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust
0.95%1.16%1.66%0.98%0.05%0.00%0.03%0.53%1.04%0.83%1.01%1.52%
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
5.09%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOVZ and FXA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOVZ has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FXA (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOVZ dropped -59.65% vs FXA's -40.97%.

On 5-year performance, FXA leads with -0.53% vs -11.86% for GOVZ. On fees, GOVZ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXA has performed better with a -0.53% return vs -11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOVZ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXA.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.95% for FXA.

GOVZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while FXA is Currency. GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, while FXA tracks USD/AUD Exchange Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GOVZ and 0.40% for FXA.

FXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOVZ and FXA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer