DBMF vs. FTS.TO
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 8.01%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for FTS.TO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBMF is traded in USD, while FTS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FTS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 11.17% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FTS.TO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.27% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 11.17% | 29.86% | 5.32% | 7.31% | -13.36% | 21.87% | 2.47% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and FTS.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | -0.05 |
The correlation between DBMF and FTS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
FTS.TO
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBMF | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.31 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 3.90 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.30 | 9.53 | +6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum FTS.TO drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and FTS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -41.25% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -6.05% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -14.45% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -30.19% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -2.00% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -8.48% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.47% | -0.79% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.71%, while Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | FTS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 4.91% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 10.85% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 13.52% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 15.81% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 17.93% | -5.52% |
Dividends
DBMF vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than FTS.TO's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 3.18% | 3.48% | 3.99% | 4.19% | 4.01% | 3.36% | 3.73% | 3.39% | 3.79% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and FTS.TO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and FTS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer