PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FTS.TOBIP-UN.TO
YTD Return16.41%17.57%
1Y Return13.99%38.66%
3Y Return (Ann)7.08%0.88%
5Y Return (Ann)7.17%2.73%
10Y Return (Ann)8.98%9.61%
Sharpe Ratio1.121.34
Sortino Ratio1.702.00
Omega Ratio1.201.23
Calmar Ratio0.970.39
Martin Ratio4.286.74
Ulcer Index3.48%5.78%
Daily Std Dev13.31%28.99%
Max Drawdown-41.48%-100.00%
Current Drawdown-1.00%-99.99%

Fundamentals


FTS.TOBIP-UN.TO
Market CapCA$30.57BCA$22.00B
EPSCA$3.23-CA$0.53
PEG Ratio3.010.00
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$8.67BCA$15.30B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$3.60BCA$3.93B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$3.83BCA$6.43B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between FTS.TO and BIP-UN.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FTS.TO achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than BIP-UN.TO's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS.TO has underperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 8.98%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.49%
-100.00%
FTS.TO
BIP-UN.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTS.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FTS.TO, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.91
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FTS.TO, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FTS.TO, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FTS.TO, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FTS.TO, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.47
BIP-UN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIP-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIP-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BIP-UN.TO, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIP-UN.TO, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BIP-UN.TO, currently valued at 5.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.77

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS.TO and BIP-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.91
1.21
FTS.TO
BIP-UN.TO

Dividends

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 4.55% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.
3.84%4.22%4.04%3.38%3.75%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%3.29%4.07%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.55%4.97%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, smaller than the maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS.TO and BIP-UN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.26%
-100.00%
FTS.TO
BIP-UN.TO

Volatility

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) is 5.48%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that FTS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.48%
7.25%
FTS.TO
BIP-UN.TO

Financials

FTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items