DBMF vs. BSV
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. DBMF is actively managed, while BSV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 7.92%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for BSV. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
DBMF vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.10% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BSV
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
DBMF vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.45% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.10% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and BSV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | -0.21 |
The correlation between DBMF and BSV shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (5 years) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
BSV
DBMF vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 2.85 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.53 | 9.83 | +7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.06 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.85 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -8.54% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -1.29% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -1.53% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -8.54% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -0.82% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -0.97% | -5.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 0.37% | +1.29% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.54%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 0.54% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 1.28% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 1.79% | +10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 2.73% | +9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 2.38% | +10.05% |
DBMF vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than BSV's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.18% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and BSV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBMF has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to BSV (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs BSV's -8.54%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.92% vs 1.57% for BSV. On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.92% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.00% for BSV.
DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while BSV is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.03% for BSV.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer