DBLTX vs. VCIT
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT).
DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. VCIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009.
Performance
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.45% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | -1.74% | 5.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLTX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 1.83%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.06% annualized return.
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
VCIT
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLTX vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
DBLTX
VCIT
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLTX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.76 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.07 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 7.31 | -1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLTX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.22 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLTX and VCIT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
DBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than VCIT's 4.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLTX drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLTX and VCIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLTX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -20.56% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.99% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | -20.56% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.49% | -20.56% | +4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.98% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -3.18% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.85% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DBLTX vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) is 1.74%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that DBLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLTX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 2.07% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.84% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 4.85% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 6.60% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 6.27% | -1.89% |