DBJP vs. XGLE.L
DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and XGLE.L (Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while XGLE.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBJP returned 15.87%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for XGLE.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XGLE.L.
Performance
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBJP is traded in USD, while XGLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than XGLE.L's -1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has outperformed XGLE.L with an annualized return of 15.87%, while XGLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.12% annualized return.
DBJP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 49.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
XGLE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 1.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- -3.19%
- 10Y*
- -0.12%
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 16.67% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
XGLE.L Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -1.08% | 14.08% | -4.61% | 10.17% | -23.15% | -10.19% | 14.03% | 4.55% | -3.92% | 14.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and XGLE.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | -0.07 |
The correlation between DBJP and XGLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. XGLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
XGLE.L
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.04 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 0.26 | +4.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 0.68 | +17.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 0.20 | +2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | -0.31 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | -0.01 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.08 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum XGLE.L drawdown of -37.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and XGLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -37.96% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -6.28% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.50% | -10.32% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -35.39% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -37.96% | +6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -18.70% | +15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -12.48% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | XGLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 2.62% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 6.33% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 8.39% | +10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 10.19% | +8.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 9.18% | +10.30% |
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XGLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBJP vs. XGLE.L - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.41% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
XGLE.L Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBJP and XGLE.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while XGLE.L is European Government Bonds. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.15% for XGLE.L.
Find the right allocation for DBJP and XGLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer