DBJP vs. SNPE
DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBJP returned 21.44%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for SNPE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for SNPE.
Performance
DBJP vs. SNPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly higher than SNPE's 9.73% return.
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 52.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DBJP vs. SNPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 20.51% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 13.00% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.73% | 18.56% | 23.85% | 27.79% | -17.67% | 31.43% | 19.84% | 12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and SNPE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DBJP and SNPE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBJP vs. SNPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBJP
SNPE
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
DBJP
SNPE
Technology
DBJP
SNPE
Financial Services
DBJP
SNPE
Consumer Cyclical
DBJP
SNPE
Communication Services
DBJP
SNPE
Healthcare
DBJP
SNPE
Consumer Defensive
DBJP
SNPE
Basic Materials
DBJP
SNPE
Real Estate
DBJP
SNPE
Utilities
DBJP
SNPE
Energy
DBJP
SNPE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. SNPE — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
SNPE
DBJP vs. SNPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.46 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 3.22 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.86 | 14.89 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.54 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.85 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.88 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. SNPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum SNPE drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and SNPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -33.37% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -9.46% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.50% | -19.15% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -24.65% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.17% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -4.96% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.04% | +0.62% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. SNPE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) at 3.30%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.30% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 9.11% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.69% | 12.03% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 17.10% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 19.67% | -0.21% |
DBJP vs. SNPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBJP vs. SNPE - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than SNPE's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.34% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBJP and SNPE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SNPE (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs SNPE's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, DBJP leads with 21.44% vs 14.46% for SNPE. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.91% for SNPE.
DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while SNPE is S&P 500. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.10% for SNPE.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBJP and SNPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer