DBJP vs. IDTP.L
DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and IDTP.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while IDTP.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBJP returned 15.87%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for IDTP.L. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IDTP.L.
Performance
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than IDTP.L's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has outperformed IDTP.L with an annualized return of 15.87%, while IDTP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.
DBJP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 49.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
IDTP.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 16.67% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.09% | 6.94% | 2.15% | 3.71% | -12.76% | 6.17% | 10.98% | 8.68% | -1.43% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and IDTP.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | -0.13 |
The correlation between DBJP and IDTP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. IDTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
IDTP.L
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 2.48 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 6.88 | +11.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.26 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.16 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.41 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.51 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -15.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and IDTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -15.12% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -1.92% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.50% | -4.51% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -15.12% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -15.12% | -16.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -0.61% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -4.22% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 0.69% | +1.98% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 1.30% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 2.66% | +11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 3.78% | +15.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 6.13% | +12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 6.37% | +13.11% |
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBJP vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.41% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBJP and IDTP.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while IDTP.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.12% for IDTP.L.
Find the right allocation for DBJP and IDTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer