PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. DXJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBJP vs. DXJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DBJP

1D
1.15%
1M
3.15%
6M
15.87%
YTD
23.02%
1Y
53.32%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
22.29%
10Y*
16.71%

DXJS

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBJP vs. DXJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
23.02%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
23.30%37.08%20.70%38.96%5.02%11.66%-3.22%18.24%-18.69%29.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and DXJS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2013

0.85

The correlation between DBJP and DXJS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. DXJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBJP vs. DXJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBJPDXJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.11

DBJP vs. DXJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. DXJS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPDXJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

Volatility

DBJP vs. DXJS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBJPDXJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

DBJP vs. DXJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBJP vs. DXJS - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while DXJS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
1.23%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
0.53%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBJP and DXJS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DXJS.

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.53% for DXJS.

DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while DXJS tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.58% for DXJS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBJP and DXJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer