DBEM vs. ECOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEM returned 9.17%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for ECOW. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.

Performance

DBEM vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than ECOW's 8.95% return.

DBEM

• 1D: -5.21%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 27.92%
• 6M: 28.44%
• 1Y: 54.61%
• 3Y*: 24.78%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

ECOW

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: 17.90%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEM vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	27.92%	30.42%	10.61%	10.53%	-17.00%	-2.26%	18.12%	3.75%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.95%	32.50%	3.17%	15.79%	-19.28%	7.47%	-2.51%	10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEM and ECOW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019	0.67

The correlation between DBEM and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEM vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEM	ECOW
Technology	43.6%	10.3%
Financial Services	17.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.7%
Industrials	6.7%	15.0%
Communication Services	6.1%	15.1%
Basic Materials	6.0%	8.4%
Energy	3.5%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	9.1%
Healthcare	2.5%	0.9%
Utilities	1.8%	6.2%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

DBEM vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEM

DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 87
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 69
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEM vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBEM	ECOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.08	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	2.82	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.38	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.22	3.69	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.15	11.56	+7.58

DBEM vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEM and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBEM vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and ECOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEM	ECOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.51%	-40.27%	+6.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-8.35%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-18.77%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-33.30%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.21%	-7.07%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.66%	-11.02%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.66%	+0.20%

Volatility

DBEM vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 5.40%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEM	ECOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.58%	5.40%	+6.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.66%	11.78%	+6.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.69%	14.78%	+5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.70%	17.75%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	20.13%	-2.74%

DBEM vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEM vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than ECOW's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	2.06%	1.84%	2.48%	2.55%	2.65%	1.77%	1.74%	2.59%	2.85%	1.51%	1.59%	3.49%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.61%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEM and ECOW in my portfolio?

DBEM and ECOW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBEM or ECOW?

DBEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to ECOW (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

Which ETF is better, DBEM or ECOW?

On 5-year performance, DBEM leads with 9.17% vs 5.74% for ECOW. On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEM or ECOW?

Over the 5-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEM or ECOW?

DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEM or ECOW?

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.06% for DBEM.

What is the main difference between DBEM and ECOW?

DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.70% for ECOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.