DBEF vs. MRGR
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and MRGR (Proshares Merger ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - DBEF tracks the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index while MRGR tracks the S&P Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.12%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for MRGR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MRGR.
Performance
DBEF vs. MRGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than MRGR's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed MRGR with an annualized return of 12.12%, while MRGR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.47% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
MRGR
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
DBEF vs. MRGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 10.25% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 1.83% | 11.99% | 5.32% | 4.94% | -4.81% | 6.58% | 1.99% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and MRGR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012 | 0.20 |
DBEF vs. MRGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
MRGR
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
MRGR
Industrials
DBEF
MRGR
Healthcare
DBEF
MRGR
Technology
DBEF
MRGR
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
MRGR
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
MRGR
Basic Materials
DBEF
MRGR
Communication Services
DBEF
MRGR
Energy
DBEF
MRGR
Utilities
DBEF
MRGR
Real Estate
DBEF
MRGR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. MRGR — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
MRGR
DBEF vs. MRGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBEF | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.56 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 8.65 | -6.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 23.71 | -12.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBEF | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.72 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 1.05 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.68 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. MRGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, which is greater than MRGR's maximum drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and MRGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -13.23% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -1.29% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -2.10% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -8.40% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -13.23% | -19.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.33% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -3.86% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 0.47% | +1.76% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. MRGR - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) at 1.08%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 1.08% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 2.95% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 4.11% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 3.82% | +9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 5.15% | +10.64% |
DBEF vs. MRGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than MRGR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. MRGR - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than MRGR's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.03% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 2.97% | 3.12% | 3.21% | 2.11% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 1.39% | 0.36% | 0.74% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and MRGR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to MRGR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs MRGR's -13.23%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.12% vs 3.47% for MRGR. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MRGR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MRGR.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.97% for MRGR.
DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while MRGR tracks S&P Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.75% for MRGR.
MRGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and MRGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer