DBEF vs. IVV
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.79%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for IVV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
DBEF vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.79%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 26.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
DBEF vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 11.60% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and IVV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DBEF and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
IVV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
IVV
Industrials
DBEF
IVV
Technology
DBEF
IVV
Healthcare
DBEF
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
IVV
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
IVV
Basic Materials
DBEF
IVV
Communication Services
DBEF
IVV
Utilities
DBEF
IVV
Energy
DBEF
IVV
Real Estate
DBEF
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
IVV
DBEF vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.76 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 12.43 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -55.25% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -8.89% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -18.75% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -24.53% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -33.90% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.35% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -10.77% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.97% | +0.26% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.37% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 9.59% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 12.28% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 16.95% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 18.08% | -2.28% |
DBEF vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 4.97% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and IVV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 12.79% for DBEF. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for DBEF.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while IVV is S&P 500. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer