PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. DBEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBEF having a 14.22% return and DBEZ slightly lower at 13.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBEF having a 12.48% annualized return and DBEZ not far behind at 12.37%.


DBEF

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.38%
6M
10.41%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
12.48%
ALL TIME*
10.37%

DBEZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.02%
6M
10.08%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.37%
ALL TIME*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.98M$24.65M$23.29M
$401.75K$249.36K$196.33K

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
14.22%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
13.66%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%15.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and DBEZ is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.92

The correlation between DBEF and DBEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
DBEZ

Financial Services

24.8%
23.6%

Industrials

19.0%
21.3%

Technology

12.7%
16.8%

Healthcare

10.4%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.8%

Utilities

3.8%
6.2%

Energy

3.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.8%
DBEZ
23.6%

Industrials

DBEF
19.0%
DBEZ
21.3%

Technology

DBEF
12.7%
DBEZ
16.8%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.4%
DBEZ
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.4%
DBEZ
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.7%
DBEZ
5.2%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.8%
DBEZ
4.3%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.4%
DBEZ
3.8%

Utilities

DBEF
3.8%
DBEZ
6.2%

Energy

DBEF
3.3%
DBEZ
3.6%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.7%
DBEZ
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. DBEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFDBEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.16

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

8.52

+3.65

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DBEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and DBEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum DBEZ drawdown of -38.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and DBEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFDBEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-38.76%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-11.03%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-15.59%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-23.38%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-38.76%

+6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.79%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-5.75%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.80%

-0.56%

Volatility

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.54%, while Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFDBEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.27%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

13.03%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

15.24%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

16.53%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

18.09%

-2.50%

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEZ's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. DBEZ - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than DBEZ's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
2.28%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
1.26%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DBEF and DBEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBEZ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to DBEF (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs DBEZ's -38.76%.

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.48% vs 12.37% for DBEZ. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.26% for DBEZ.

DBEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBEZ is Europe Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and DBEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer