DBE vs. BPH
DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both Oil & Gas funds. DBE is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBE charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
DBE vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 3.48% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBE and BPH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBE vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
DBE
BPH
DBE vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBE | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBE | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 9.48 | -9.38 |
Drawdowns
DBE vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBE drawdown since its inception was -86.69%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBE and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBE | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.69% | -2.35% | -84.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.27% | 0.00% | -30.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.31% | -1.08% | -56.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility
DBE vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBE | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 25.75% | +9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 25.75% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 25.75% | +2.58% |
DBE vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBE has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBE vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBE and BPH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBE and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for DBE and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer