DBCMX vs. FCGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX).
DBCMX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on May 17, 2015. FCGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009.
Performance
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 23.68% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 22.54% | 27.29% | 1.90% | -6.06% | 19.45% | 24.85% | 4.96% | 16.74% | -14.07% | 17.33% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBCMX having a 23.68% return and FCGCX slightly lower at 22.54%. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX has underperformed FCGCX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while FCGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
DBCMX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
FCGCX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 30.53%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FCGCX's 1.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBCMX vs. FCGCX — Risk / Return Rank
DBCMX
FCGCX
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBCMX | FCGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.48 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 2.99 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.34 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 17.14 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBCMX | FCGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.48 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.68 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.31 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBCMX and FCGCX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Dividend Comparison
DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than FCGCX's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C | 1.21% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 0.80% | 1.09% | 2.41% | 0.59% | 1.94% | 1.11% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.49% |
Drawdowns
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum FCGCX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and FCGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBCMX | FCGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -59.67% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | -14.67% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.60% | -27.43% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.62% | -49.31% | +11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.41% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -21.40% | +7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.86% | -0.76% |
Volatility
DBCMX vs. FCGCX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBCMX | FCGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 6.10% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 13.75% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 20.52% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 21.54% | -5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 22.54% | -8.04% |