DBCMX vs. DSL
DBCMX (DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund) and DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) are both mutual funds - DBCMX is a Commodities fund managed by DoubleLine, while DSL is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX returned 6.14%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for DSL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBCMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for DSL.
Performance
DBCMX vs. DSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than DSL's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX has outperformed DSL with an annualized return of 6.14%, while DSL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
DBCMX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- 18.01%
- 6M
- 18.44%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.14%
DSL
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -0.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
DBCMX vs. DSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 18.01% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.94% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -6.49% | 25.10% | -6.04% | 16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBCMX and DSL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between DBCMX and DSL shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBCMX vs. DSL — Risk / Return Rank
DBCMX
DSL
DBCMX vs. DSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBCMX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.00 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.03 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | -0.05 | +10.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBCMX vs. DSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum DSL drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and DSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBCMX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -49.51% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -11.16% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -14.43% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.60% | -34.18% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.62% | -49.51% | +11.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.98% | -5.86% | -6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -8.73% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 5.74% | -3.35% |
Volatility
DBCMX vs. DSL - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) at 2.20%. This indicates that DBCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBCMX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.20% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 7.67% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 9.30% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 14.85% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 20.09% | -5.46% |
DBCMX vs. DSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than DSL's 2.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBCMX vs. DSL - Dividend Comparison
DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than DSL's 12.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.19% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBCMX and DSL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBCMX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DSL (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBCMX dropped -37.62% vs DSL's -49.51%.
DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBCMX and DSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer