DBC vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
DBC and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. It was launched on Feb 3, 2006. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both DBC and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DBC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBC vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 28.26% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.18% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 28.26% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.02%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.
DBC
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 28.26%
- 6M
- 31.82%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
XLG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
XLG
DBC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBC | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 0.99 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 1.54 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.63 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | 5.71 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBC | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.99 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.75 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and XLG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.59% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
DBC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -52.39% | -23.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -12.41% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -28.02% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -30.46% | -11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.80% | -8.93% | -16.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -7.69% | -38.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 3.54% | +0.73% |
Volatility
DBC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.82%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 5.82% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 10.65% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | 19.97% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 18.68% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 18.81% | -1.09% |