DBC vs. RODM
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBC returned 8.13%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for RODM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
DBC vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed RODM with an annualized return of 8.13%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.
DBC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 27.88%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
DBC vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.21% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and RODM is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.28 |
The correlation between DBC and RODM shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
RODM
DBC vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.60 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 14.32 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -35.98% | -40.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -7.10% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -10.58% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -28.85% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -35.98% | -5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.99% | -0.84% | -26.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.19% | -6.36% | -39.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 1.78% | +1.86% |
Volatility
DBC vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.58%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 3.58% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 8.77% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 11.01% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 13.48% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 15.22% | +2.60% |
DBC vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than RODM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.64% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and RODM have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.24% vs 8.13% for DBC. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.64% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer