DBC vs. QYLD
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBC returned 8.13%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
DBC vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DBC has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 8.13%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
DBC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 27.88%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
DBC vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.21% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 8.36% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and QYLD is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.17 |
The correlation between DBC and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
QYLD
DBC vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.58 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 4.81 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 27.11 | -19.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -24.75% | -51.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -4.97% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -19.06% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -24.61% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | -24.75% | -16.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.99% | 0.00% | -26.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.19% | -3.83% | -42.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 0.88% | +2.76% |
Volatility
DBC vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 3.87%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 3.87% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 7.86% | +8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 9.19% | +9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 14.77% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 15.53% | +2.29% |
DBC vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than QYLD's 11.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.64% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.41% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and QYLD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to QYLD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.92% vs 8.13% for DBC. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 2.64% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer