PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBB vs. BCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBB vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBB achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 21.04% return.


DBB

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.39%
YTD
10.81%
6M
18.37%
1Y
40.01%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.08%

BCI

1D
-1.25%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
21.04%
6M
21.46%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBB vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
10.81%25.01%7.90%1.15%-11.80%28.97%15.53%-1.17%-19.47%17.14%
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
21.04%15.07%5.47%-8.79%15.09%26.18%-2.77%7.06%-11.21%3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DBB and BCI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017

0.51

The correlation between DBB and BCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBB vs. BCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBB
BCI

Financial Services

98.8%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DBB
98.8%
BCI
100.0%

Basic Materials

DBB

-

BCI

-

Communication Services

DBB

-

BCI

-

Consumer Cyclical

DBB

-

BCI

-

Consumer Defensive

DBB

-

BCI

-

Energy

DBB

-

BCI

-

Healthcare

DBB

-

BCI

-

Industrials

DBB

-

BCI

-

Real Estate

DBB

-

BCI

-

Technology

DBB

-

BCI

-

Utilities

DBB

-

BCI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBB vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBB
DBB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BCI
BCI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBB vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBBBCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.59

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

10.13

+3.68

DBB vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBB Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBB and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBBBCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.83

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.60

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.45

-0.38

Drawdowns

DBB vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBB drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBB and BCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBBBCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-32.69%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-8.76%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-11.38%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-26.50%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-8.76%

+4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-11.99%

-18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.10%

-0.20%

Volatility

DBB vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.39%. This indicates that DBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBBBCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

5.39%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

15.11%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

17.19%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

16.85%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

15.67%

+2.81%

DBB vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBB vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

DBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than BCI's 13.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
13.62%16.49%3.29%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
2.36%2.61%4.75%7.21%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.83%1.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBB and BCI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBB has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to BCI (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBB dropped -60.20% vs BCI's -32.69%.

On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 10.02% vs 7.62% for DBB. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DBB.

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.62%, compared with 2.36% for DBB.

DBB is categorized as Metals, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DBB and 0.25% for BCI.

DBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBB and BCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer