DBB vs. BCI
DBB (Invesco DB Base Metals Fund) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBB is a Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBB returned 6.73%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for BCI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBB charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
DBB vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBB achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 13.36% return.
DBB
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 26.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
BCI
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 23.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
DBB vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBB Invesco DB Base Metals Fund | 4.53% | 25.01% | 7.90% | 1.15% | -11.80% | 28.97% | 15.53% | -1.17% | -19.47% | 17.14% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.36% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBB and BCI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between DBB and BCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBB vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
DBB
BCI
DBB vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBB | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.59 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 6.22 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBB vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBB drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBB and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBB | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.20% | -32.69% | -27.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -14.82% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.59% | -14.82% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.00% | -26.50% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.95% | -14.55% | +4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -11.99% | -18.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.77% | -0.46% |
Volatility
DBB vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 4.07%. This indicates that DBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBB | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 4.07% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.55% | 15.15% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 17.20% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 16.84% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 15.66% | +2.86% |
DBB vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBB vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
DBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than BCI's 14.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.54% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
DBB Invesco DB Base Metals Fund | 2.50% | 2.61% | 4.75% | 7.21% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 1.59% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBB and BCI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBB has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to BCI (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBB dropped -60.20% vs BCI's -32.69%.
On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 8.64% vs 6.73% for DBB. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 8.64% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DBB.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.54%, compared with 2.50% for DBB.
DBB is categorized as Metals, while BCI is Commodities. DBB tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DBB and 0.26% for BCI.
DBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBB and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer