DBA vs. VITL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, DBA returned 9.87%/yr vs -14.55%/yr for VITL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DBA vs. VITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -69.10% return.

DBA

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 5.49%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

VITL

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -24.08%
• YTD: -69.10%
• 6M: -67.66%
• 1Y: -68.47%
• 3Y*: -12.45%
• 5Y*: -14.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBA vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund	5.25%	-0.56%	33.45%	7.64%	2.53%	22.37%	13.82%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	-69.10%	-15.26%	140.22%	5.16%	-17.39%	-28.64%	-28.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DBA and VITL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020	0.07

Return for Risk

DBA vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBA

DBA Risk / Return Rank: 14
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VITL

VITL Risk / Return Rank: 5
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBA vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBA	VITL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	-1.12	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	-2.13	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.75	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	-0.81	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	-1.48	+2.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBA vs. VITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the VITL Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBA and VITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBA	VITL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	-1.12	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	-0.27	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.37	+0.45

Drawdowns

DBA vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and VITL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBA	VITL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.97%	-84.20%	+16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.99%	-84.20%	+76.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.36%	-84.20%	+71.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-84.20%	+68.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.90%	-81.17%	+55.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.11%	-47.21%	+6.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	46.28%	-42.21%

Volatility

DBA vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) is 4.17%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 30.14%. This indicates that DBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBA	VITL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	30.14%	-25.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.46%	48.39%	-41.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	61.36%	-50.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.10%	54.20%	-40.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.09%	53.78%	-40.69%

Dividends

DBA vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison

DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund	3.40%	3.58%	4.08%	4.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	1.55%	1.06%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBA and VITL in my portfolio?

DBA and VITL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBA or VITL?

VITL has higher volatility (30.14%) compared to DBA (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBA dropped -67.97% vs VITL's -84.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.