DBA vs. PDBC
DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. DBA is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBA returned 4.14%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBA charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
DBA vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DBA has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 4.14%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.69% annualized return.
DBA
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
DBA vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 8.82% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -6.06% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.08% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBA and PDBC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between DBA and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBA vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
DBA
PDBC
DBA vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBA | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.75 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 6.25 | -3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBA vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBA | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.97% | -49.52% | -18.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -16.55% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -16.55% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.94% | -27.63% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.97% | -40.73% | +2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.39% | -13.06% | -10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -23.11% | -17.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 4.64% | -0.52% |
Volatility
DBA vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) is 3.88%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that DBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBA | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 5.48% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 16.59% | -9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 18.72% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 19.19% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 17.75% | -4.69% |
DBA vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBA has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBA vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than PDBC's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.29% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.09% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBA and PDBC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to DBA (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBA dropped -67.97% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 7.69% vs 4.14% for DBA. On fees, PDBC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDBC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for DBA.
DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 3.09% for PDBC.
DBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while PDBC is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for DBA and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBA and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer