PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBA vs. FTAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBA vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, DBA has underperformed FTAG with an annualized return of 3.65%, while FTAG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.38% annualized return.


DBA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
4.23%
6M
4.40%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
3.65%

FTAG

1D
-1.13%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.97%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBA vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
4.23%-0.56%33.45%7.64%2.53%22.37%-2.54%-0.71%-8.74%-6.06%
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
6.79%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%13.88%9.05%-19.46%24.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DBA and FTAG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBA vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBA
DBA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBA vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBAFTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.89

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

2.04

-1.00

DBA vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBA and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBA vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and FTAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAFTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-90.89%

+22.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-9.56%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-21.87%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.94%

-32.77%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.12%

-50.79%

+11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.62%

-79.35%

+52.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-71.25%

+30.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

4.15%

-0.17%

Volatility

DBA vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) is 2.62%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that DBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAFTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.95%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

10.93%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

14.17%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

17.41%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

19.60%

-6.55%

DBA vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBA has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBA vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than FTAG's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
3.43%3.58%4.08%4.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%1.55%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.42%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBA and FTAG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to DBA (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBA dropped -67.97% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

On 10-year performance, FTAG leads with 5.38% vs 3.65% for DBA. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTAG has performed better with a 5.38% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for DBA.

DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.42% for FTAG.

DBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FTAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return, while FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for DBA and 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBA and FTAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer