PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAX vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAX vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 8.97%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


DAX

1D
-1.53%
1M
2.29%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
2.93%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.97%

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAX vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-0.66%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and XYLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014

0.57

The correlation between DAX and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DAX vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAX
XYLD

Industrials

34.8%
8.3%

Financial Services

21.0%
11.8%

Technology

13.2%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
10.2%

Communication Services

6.1%
11.2%

Healthcare

5.7%
8.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.8%

Utilities

5.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Industrials

DAX
34.8%
XYLD
8.3%

Financial Services

DAX
21.0%
XYLD
11.8%

Technology

DAX
13.2%
XYLD
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DAX
7.0%
XYLD
10.2%

Communication Services

DAX
6.1%
XYLD
11.2%

Healthcare

DAX
5.7%
XYLD
8.5%

Basic Materials

DAX
5.3%
XYLD
1.8%

Utilities

DAX
5.0%
XYLD
2.3%

Real Estate

DAX
1.0%
XYLD
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

DAX
0.9%
XYLD
4.9%

Energy

DAX

-

XYLD
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAX vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAX vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAXXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.64

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.35

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

17.84

-17.01

DAX vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAXXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

2.71

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.69

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.58

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.60

-0.25

Drawdowns

DAX vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAXXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-33.46%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-5.29%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-15.53%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

-18.66%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

-33.46%

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-0.15%

-4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-3.72%

-6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

0.99%

+3.69%

Volatility

DAX vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that DAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAXXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

0.88%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

5.37%

+9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

6.55%

+11.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

11.22%

+9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

14.21%

+7.07%

DAX vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAX vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.48%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAX and XYLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 8.97% vs 8.25% for XYLD. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.

DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. DAX tracks DAX Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAX and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer