DAX vs. URA
DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DAX returned 8.97%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for URA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
DAX vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 8.97%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.12% annualized return.
DAX
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
URA
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 61.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.27%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
DAX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -0.66% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 12.27% | 22.11% | -22.92% | 28.23% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 17.93% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAX and URA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014 | 0.46 |
DAX vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAX
URA
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
DAX
URA
Financial Services
DAX
URA
-
Technology
DAX
URA
Consumer Cyclical
DAX
URA
-
Communication Services
DAX
URA
-
Healthcare
DAX
URA
-
Basic Materials
DAX
URA
Utilities
DAX
URA
Real Estate
DAX
URA
-
Consumer Defensive
DAX
URA
-
Energy
DAX
-
URA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
DAX
URA
DAX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 2.17 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 4.58 | -3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.23 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.49 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.05 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
DAX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.58% | -93.54% | +47.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -28.43% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -37.81% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.96% | -37.90% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -61.45% | +15.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -42.81% | +38.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -75.01% | +64.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 13.40% | -8.72% |
Volatility
DAX vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) is 6.09%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that DAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 15.94% | -9.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | 38.29% | -23.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 50.19% | -32.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 43.62% | -23.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 37.73% | -16.45% |
DAX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than URA's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.48% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.14% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAX and URA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to DAX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 10-year performance, URA leads with 17.12% vs 8.97% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.
DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. DAX tracks DAX Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.69% for URA.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAX and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer