DAX vs. FLGR
DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - DAX tracks the DAX Index while FLGR tracks the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAX returned 7.71%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for FLGR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGR.
Performance
DAX vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLGR's 0.44% return.
DAX
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
FLGR
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- —
DAX vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -0.66% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 12.27% | 22.11% | -22.92% | -0.60% |
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 0.44% | 36.67% | 10.63% | 24.22% | -21.96% | 5.40% | 12.11% | 19.99% | -21.50% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAX and FLGR is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DAX and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DAX vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAX
FLGR
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
-
Industrials
DAX
FLGR
Financial Services
DAX
FLGR
Technology
DAX
FLGR
Consumer Cyclical
DAX
FLGR
Communication Services
DAX
FLGR
Healthcare
DAX
FLGR
Basic Materials
DAX
FLGR
Utilities
DAX
FLGR
Real Estate
DAX
FLGR
Consumer Defensive
DAX
FLGR
Energy
DAX
-
FLGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAX vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank
DAX
FLGR
DAX vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAX | FLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.22 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAX | FLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.19 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.32 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.28 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
DAX vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and FLGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAX | FLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.58% | -46.21% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -14.44% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -15.53% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.96% | -43.54% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -4.26% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -12.37% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 5.03% | -0.35% |
Volatility
DAX vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison
Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) have volatilities of 6.09% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAX | FLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 6.23% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | 14.03% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 17.18% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 20.26% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 21.43% | -0.15% |
DAX vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DAX vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison
DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FLGR's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.48% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 1.71% | 1.72% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.50% | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DAX and FLGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to DAX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs FLGR's -46.21%.
On 5-year performance, DAX leads with 7.71% vs 6.45% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DAX has performed better with a 7.71% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DAX.
FLGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.
DAX tracks DAX Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.09% for FLGR.
DAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAX and FLGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer