PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGR vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGR vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 15.85% return.


FLGR

1D
0.13%
1M
3.06%
YTD
2.39%
6M
6.46%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

FLJP

1D
0.60%
1M
5.69%
YTD
15.85%
6M
17.72%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGR vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
2.39%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
15.85%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGR and FLJP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.62

The correlation between FLGR and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGR vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGR
FLJP

Industrials

30.5%
25.4%

Financial Services

21.7%
16.0%

Technology

13.9%
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
12.2%

Communication Services

6.3%
6.3%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.8%

Utilities

5.0%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.9%

Energy

-

0.9%

Industrials

FLGR
30.5%
FLJP
25.4%

Financial Services

FLGR
21.7%
FLJP
16.0%

Technology

FLGR
13.9%
FLJP
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGR
8.2%
FLJP
12.2%

Communication Services

FLGR
6.3%
FLJP
6.3%

Basic Materials

FLGR
5.9%
FLJP
4.9%

Healthcare

FLGR
5.8%
FLJP
5.8%

Utilities

FLGR
5.0%
FLJP
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLGR
1.4%
FLJP
3.9%

Real Estate

FLGR
1.3%
FLJP
2.9%

Energy

FLGR

-

FLJP
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGR vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGR vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGRFLJPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

1.63

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

2.37

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.31

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

2.43

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.11

8.44

-7.34

FLGR vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGR and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGRFLJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.63

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.52

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Drawdowns

FLGR vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGRFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-32.49%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-13.30%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-14.17%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.54%

-32.49%

-11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.40%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-9.37%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

3.83%

+1.19%

Volatility

FLGR vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 4.16%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGRFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

4.16%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

14.73%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

18.95%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.75%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

17.80%

+3.62%

FLGR vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLGR and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGR vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FLJP's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.68%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.44%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGR and FLJP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FLJP (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.20% vs 7.01% for FLGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR and FLJP have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.68% for FLGR.

FLGR is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLJP is Japan Equities. FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGR and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer