FLGR vs. FLJP
FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGR returned 7.01%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for FLJP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLGR vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 15.85% return.
FLGR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 15.85%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGR vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 2.39% | 36.67% | 10.63% | 24.22% | -21.96% | 5.40% | 12.11% | 19.99% | -21.50% | -0.27% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 15.85% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGR and FLJP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FLGR and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLGR vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGR
FLJP
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Industrials
FLGR
FLJP
Financial Services
FLGR
FLJP
Technology
FLGR
FLJP
Consumer Cyclical
FLGR
FLJP
Communication Services
FLGR
FLJP
Basic Materials
FLGR
FLJP
Healthcare
FLGR
FLJP
Utilities
FLGR
FLJP
Consumer Defensive
FLGR
FLJP
Real Estate
FLGR
FLJP
Energy
FLGR
-
FLJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGR vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
FLGR
FLJP
FLGR vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 1.63 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 2.37 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 2.43 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 8.44 | -7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.63 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.45 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
FLGR vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -32.49% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -13.30% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -14.17% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.54% | -32.49% | -11.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -0.40% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -9.37% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 3.83% | +1.19% |
Volatility
FLGR vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 4.16%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGR | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 4.16% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 14.73% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 18.95% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 17.75% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 17.80% | +3.62% |
FLGR vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLGR and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLGR vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than FLJP's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 1.68% | 1.72% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.50% | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 0.00% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.44% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGR and FLJP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGR has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FLJP (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs FLJP's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, FLJP leads with 9.20% vs 7.01% for FLGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGR and FLJP have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.68% for FLGR.
FLGR is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLJP is Japan Equities. FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGR and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer