PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DASCX vs. USBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DASCX vs. USBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DASCX achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than USBNX's 10.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DASCX having a 8.08% annualized return and USBNX not far behind at 7.72%.


DASCX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.83%
YTD
14.31%
6M
14.45%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
8.08%

USBNX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.74%
YTD
10.70%
6M
12.15%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DASCX vs. USBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DASCX
Dean Small Cap Value Fund
14.31%5.00%3.71%2.76%1.76%31.48%-1.73%20.98%-13.07%3.72%
USBNX
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund
10.70%8.02%8.64%12.83%-5.09%15.35%-4.77%23.53%-11.05%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DASCX and USBNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.91

The correlation between DASCX and USBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DASCX vs. USBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DASCX
DASCX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

USBNX
USBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
USBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DASCX vs. USBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DASCXUSBNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.42

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

2.18

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.08

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.47

6.40

+1.07

DASCX vs. USBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the USBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DASCX and USBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DASCXUSBNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.42

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Drawdowns

DASCX vs. USBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, smaller than the maximum USBNX drawdown of -64.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASCX and USBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DASCXUSBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.74%

-64.40%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-9.19%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.79%

-21.56%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.79%

-26.01%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-46.96%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.15%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-13.64%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.98%

+1.00%

Volatility

DASCX vs. USBNX - Volatility Comparison

Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) at 3.58%. This indicates that DASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DASCXUSBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.58%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

9.23%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

14.85%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

18.77%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

21.66%

-0.81%

DASCX vs. USBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DASCX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than USBNX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DASCX vs. USBNX - Dividend Comparison

DASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than USBNX's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DASCX
Dean Small Cap Value Fund
1.75%1.99%3.82%1.75%1.28%0.98%1.61%4.03%3.22%18.27%3.96%6.68%
USBNX
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund
12.48%13.81%3.27%0.86%10.05%0.75%0.68%7.91%8.39%6.21%1.17%7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DASCX and USBNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DASCX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to USBNX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASCX dropped -58.74% vs USBNX's -64.40%.

DASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DASCX and USBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer