DASCX vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
DASCX is managed by Dean Fund. It was launched on May 28, 1997. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
DASCX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DASCX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASCX Dean Small Cap Value Fund | 2.13% | 5.00% | 3.71% | 2.76% | 1.76% | 31.48% | -1.73% | 20.98% | -13.07% | 3.72% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DASCX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DASCX has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 7.30%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.
DASCX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DASCX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DASCX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DASCX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
DASCX
IWM
DASCX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DASCX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.11 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.66 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.82 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 6.76 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DASCX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.11 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.15 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.34 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between DASCX and IWM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DASCX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
DASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASCX Dean Small Cap Value Fund | 1.95% | 1.99% | 3.82% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 0.98% | 1.61% | 4.03% | 3.22% | 18.27% | 3.96% | 6.68% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
DASCX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASCX and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASCX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -59.05% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -13.74% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.79% | -31.91% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.28% | -41.13% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.54% | -7.91% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -10.83% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 3.70% | +0.73% |
Volatility
DASCX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) is 6.33%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that DASCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DASCX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 7.47% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 14.47% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.81% | 23.18% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 22.55% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.99% | -2.16% |