PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DASCX vs. SCYVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DASCX achieves a 21.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCYVX's 27.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DASCX has underperformed SCYVX with an annualized return of 8.58%, while SCYVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.


DASCX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.73%
6M
11.18%
YTD
21.59%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.58%

SCYVX

1D
0.56%
1M
2.86%
6M
17.44%
YTD
27.16%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DASCX
Dean Small Cap Value Fund
21.59%5.00%3.71%2.76%1.76%31.48%-1.73%20.98%-13.07%3.72%
SCYVX
AB Small Cap Value Portfolio
27.16%-0.02%11.46%7.82%-16.68%35.56%3.45%25.72%-16.43%8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DASCX and SCYVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.92

The correlation between DASCX and SCYVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DASCX vs. SCYVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DASCX
DASCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SCYVX
SCYVX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCYVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DASCXSCYVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.69

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

10.94

-2.50

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SCYVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DASCX and SCYVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than SCYVX's maximum drawdown of -47.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASCX and SCYVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DASCXSCYVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.74%

-47.74%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-8.71%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.79%

-27.12%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.79%

-29.12%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-47.74%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.15%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-9.37%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

2.94%

+0.97%

Volatility

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Volatility Comparison

Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DASCXSCYVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.77%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

11.44%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

17.10%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

21.63%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

23.89%

-3.15%

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DASCX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYVX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

DASCX vs. SCYVX - Dividend Comparison

DASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than SCYVX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DASCX
Dean Small Cap Value Fund
1.64%1.99%3.82%1.75%1.28%0.98%1.61%4.03%3.22%18.27%3.96%6.68%
SCYVX
AB Small Cap Value Portfolio
3.83%4.87%4.23%0.52%5.15%7.39%0.55%5.37%6.44%5.67%0.54%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DASCX and SCYVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCYVX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DASCX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASCX dropped -58.74% vs SCYVX's -47.74%.

SCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DASCX and SCYVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer