DASCX vs. NSDVX
DASCX (Dean Small Cap Value Fund) and NSDVX (North Star Dividend Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DASCX returned 8.60%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for NSDVX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DASCX charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for NSDVX.
Performance
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DASCX having a 23.05% return and NSDVX slightly lower at 22.74%. Over the past 10 years, DASCX has outperformed NSDVX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while NSDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.
DASCX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 36.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.76%
NSDVX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASCX Dean Small Cap Value Fund | 23.05% | 5.00% | 3.71% | 2.76% | 1.76% | 31.48% | -1.73% | 20.98% | -13.07% | 3.72% |
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 22.74% | -1.31% | 9.25% | 8.06% | -6.36% | 16.16% | 6.51% | 16.13% | -12.35% | 8.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DASCX and NSDVX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DASCX and NSDVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DASCX vs. NSDVX — Risk / Return Rank
DASCX
NSDVX
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DASCX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.56 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 7.64 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than NSDVX's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASCX and NSDVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASCX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -38.64% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -10.48% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.79% | -16.41% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.79% | -21.27% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.28% | -38.64% | -7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.68% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -6.48% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.50% | +0.35% |
Volatility
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Volatility Comparison
Dean Small Cap Value Fund (DASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) at 3.70%. This indicates that DASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DASCX | NSDVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.70% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 9.57% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 14.70% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 16.03% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 17.75% | +3.00% |
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DASCX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NSDVX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
DASCX vs. NSDVX - Dividend Comparison
DASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than NSDVX's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASCX Dean Small Cap Value Fund | 1.62% | 1.99% | 3.82% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 0.98% | 1.61% | 4.03% | 3.22% | 18.27% | 3.96% | 6.68% |
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund | 2.74% | 3.45% | 7.00% | 2.52% | 6.57% | 3.31% | 1.52% | 2.64% | 6.87% | 2.48% | 4.67% | 3.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DASCX and NSDVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DASCX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to NSDVX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASCX dropped -58.74% vs NSDVX's -38.64%.
DASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DASCX and NSDVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer