DARP vs. VV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DARP is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 82.62% vs 27.77% for VV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.

Performance

DARP vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 32.67% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 10.69% return.

DARP

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: 32.67%
• 6M: 34.22%
• 1Y: 82.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VV

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: 15.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	32.67%	40.19%	24.63%	6.25%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	10.69%	18.11%	25.25%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and VV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023	0.81

The correlation between DARP and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DARP vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DARP	VV
Technology	45.8%	35.9%
Communication Services	19.4%	11.2%
Industrials	12.0%	8.0%
Energy	9.9%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	9.8%
Utilities	5.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	1.6%
Healthcare	1.4%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	11.8%
Real Estate	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

DARP vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 91
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 94

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 67
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DARP	VV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.59	2.33	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	3.18	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.42	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.03	3.03	+4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.75	13.86	+12.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DARP vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DARP	VV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.59	2.33	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	0.59	+0.89

Drawdowns

DARP vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and VV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DARP	VV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-54.81%	+24.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	-9.21%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.72%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-6.84%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.01%	+1.09%

Volatility

DARP vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DARP	VV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	2.84%	+4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.49%	8.98%	+8.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	11.99%	+11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.11%	17.22%	+8.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.11%	18.19%	+7.92%

DARP vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

DARP vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.33%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	0.98%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DARP and VV in my portfolio?

DARP and VV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DARP or VV?

DARP has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs VV's -54.81%.

Which ETF is better, DARP or VV?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 82.62% vs 27.77% for VV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DARP or VV?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 82.62% return vs 27.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DARP or VV?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DARP or VV?

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.33% for DARP.

What is the main difference between DARP and VV?

They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.04% for VV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.