DARP vs. SPMO
DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. DARP is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 68.50% vs 43.55% for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
DARP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return.
DARP
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 68.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
DARP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 26.21% | 40.19% | 24.63% | 6.25% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DARP and SPMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DARP and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DARP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DARP
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DARP
SPMO
Communication Services
DARP
SPMO
Energy
DARP
SPMO
Industrials
DARP
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
DARP
SPMO
Utilities
DARP
SPMO
Basic Materials
DARP
SPMO
Healthcare
DARP
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
DARP
-
SPMO
Financial Services
DARP
-
SPMO
Real Estate
DARP
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DARP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
DARP
SPMO
DARP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 3.45 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.69 | 12.97 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DARP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -30.95% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -12.70% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -4.53% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -4.59% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.37% | -0.05% |
Volatility
DARP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is 10.71%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that DARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 11.75% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.20% | 17.78% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 20.55% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 19.88% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 20.60% | +5.88% |
DARP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DARP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DARP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to DARP (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 68.50% vs 43.55% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 68.50% return vs 43.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.
DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.13% for SPMO.
DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DARP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer