DARP vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. DARP is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 69.08% vs 82.93% for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

DARP vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.

DARP

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 29.87%
• 1Y: 69.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 82.93%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	26.22%	40.19%	24.63%	6.25%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	50.54%	11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and QTUM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023	0.80

The correlation between DARP and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DARP vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DARP	QTUM
Technology	45.8%	85.1%
Communication Services	19.4%	4.9%
Industrials	12.0%	8.7%
Energy	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	0.7%
Utilities	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Healthcare	1.4%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DARP vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 89
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DARP	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.94	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.45	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.88	5.46	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.19	19.77	+1.42

DARP vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DARP vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DARP	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-38.45%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	-15.26%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.58%	-4.42%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-8.24%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	4.21%	-0.94%

Volatility

DARP vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is 8.82%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that DARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DARP	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.82%	14.18%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	23.17%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.11%	28.39%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	26.99%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	27.40%	-1.11%

DARP vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DARP vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QTUM's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.34%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DARP and QTUM in my portfolio?

DARP and QTUM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DARP or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to DARP (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, DARP or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 82.93% vs 69.08% for DARP. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 8.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DARP or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 82.93% return vs 69.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DARP or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DARP or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.

What is the main difference between DARP and QTUM?

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.